HOME Popular Books Popular Audioooks Popular Textbooks Popular Freebooks More Genres

Book

Audiobook

Genres

In Re Estate Of Rowzee J. Bower

By Supreme Court Of California In Bank

Release : 1938-04-20

Genre : Law, Books, Professional & Technical

Kind : ebook

(0 ratings)
WASTE, C.J. This is an appeal from an order admitting a document to probate as the last will and testament of the decedent and appointing respondent administratrix with the will annexed. The document bears date of ,arch 4, 1932, and purports to devise the decedent's entire estate to respondent, a stranger to the blood. It was admitted to probate as an holographic will, the court below finding that it was "entirely written, dated and signed by the hand of the said decedent". The contestant and appellant is a brother of the decedent who has contended at all times that the document is invalid as an holographic will because not entirely in the handwriting of the decedent. He claims as an heir at law and as a devisee under an earlier testamentary effort by the terms of which the decedent undertook to dispose of his estate in equal shares to his sister and two brothers. This earlier document was likewise found by the court below to be entirely written, dated and signed by the decedent but was denied probate because of the existence of the later and inconsistent document which, as stated, was found to be validly executed.

In Re Estate Of Rowzee J. Bower

By Supreme Court Of California In Bank

Release : 1938-04-20

Genre : Law, Books, Professional & Technical

Kind : ebook

(0 ratings)
WASTE, C.J. This is an appeal from an order admitting a document to probate as the last will and testament of the decedent and appointing respondent administratrix with the will annexed. The document bears date of ,arch 4, 1932, and purports to devise the decedent's entire estate to respondent, a stranger to the blood. It was admitted to probate as an holographic will, the court below finding that it was "entirely written, dated and signed by the hand of the said decedent". The contestant and appellant is a brother of the decedent who has contended at all times that the document is invalid as an holographic will because not entirely in the handwriting of the decedent. He claims as an heir at law and as a devisee under an earlier testamentary effort by the terms of which the decedent undertook to dispose of his estate in equal shares to his sister and two brothers. This earlier document was likewise found by the court below to be entirely written, dated and signed by the decedent but was denied probate because of the existence of the later and inconsistent document which, as stated, was found to be validly executed.

advertisement

Access e-books

More By Supreme Court Of California In Bank

Union Oil Associates V. Johnson

Wood v. Pendola

Tracy v. Contractors State License Board

People v. Garcia

People V. Mccaughan

People v. One Harley-Davidson Motorcycle

Freeman V. Department Of Motor Vehicles

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmens Compensation Appeals Board And John Raymond Cardoza

Keys V. Romley

In Re Ring

Powell V. California Department Of Employment

People V. Westbrook

Estate of Josephine H. Graham v. Salvation Army of California

Supreme Grand Lodge of Ancient And Mystical Order Rosae Cruscis v. Smith

People V. Moore

Estate Of Emma C. Heard V. Most Worshipful Grand Lodge Of Free And Accepted Masons

M. P. Moller Inc. V. Wilson

Tri-Q Inc. V. Sta-Hi Corp.

Chalmers-Francis v. Nelson

Odonnell v. Mullaney

Funeral Directors Association Of Los Angeles And Southern California V. Board Of Funeral Directors And Embalmers

Carroll v. California Horse Racing Board

In Re Estate Of Rowzee J. Bower

Estate of Katherine Ryan v. Scully

Ames v. Empire Star Mines Co.

Steiner v. Amsel

Menghetti v. Dillon

Peck v. State Bar of California

Anderson v. Eaton

Estate Of Alfred Easter V. Jones

Escola V. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Pashley V. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

Ybarra V. Spangard

Estate Of Robert Franklin Green V. Ellis

Puckett V. Puckett

Gold Mining And Water Co. V. Swinerton

Natural Soda Products Co. V. City Of Los Angeles

Estate Of Ella M. Henderson V. Eastern Star Homes Of California

Irelan-Yuba Gold Quartz Mining Co. V. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Hatfield V. Levy Brothers

Academy Of Motion Picture Arts And Sciences V. Benson

People V. Lisenba

People V. Brite

Hinkle V. Southern Pacific Co.

Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District V. Klukkert

Douglas Aircraft Co. V. Johnson

City Of Manhattan Beach V. Cortelyou

Rancho Santa Margarita V. Margaret R. Vail

People V. Lamson

People V. Hill